Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Malaysian Family Physician ; : 1-2, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-829775
2.
Malaysian Family Physician ; : 1-2, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-875724
3.
Malaysian Family Physician ; : 6-14, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-825435

ABSTRACT

@#Introduction: This study aimed to determine the views and practices of healthcare providers and barriers they encountered when implementing the national health screening program for men in a public primary care setting in Malaysia. Methods: An online survey was conducted among healthcare providers across public health clinics in Malaysia. All family medicine specialists, medical officers, nurses and assistant medical officers involved in the screening program for adult men were invited to answer a 51-item questionnaire via email or WhatsApp. The questionnaire comprised five sections: participants’ socio-demographic information, current screening practices, barriers and facilitators to using the screening tool, and views on the content and format of the screening tool. Results: A total of 231 healthcare providers from 129 health clinics participated in this survey. Among them, 37.44% perceived the implementation of the screening program as a “top-down decision.” Although 37.44% found the screening tool for adult men “useful,” some felt that it was “time consuming” to fill out (38.2%) and “lengthy” (28.3%). In addition, ‘adult men refuse to answer’ (24.1%) was cited as the most common patient-related barrier. Conclusions: This study provided useful insights into the challenges encountered by the public healthcare providers when implementing a national screening program for men. The screening tool for adult men should be revised to make it more user-friendly. Further studies should explore the reasons why men were reluctant to participate in health screenings, thus enhancing the implementation of screening programs in primary care.

4.
Singapore medical journal ; : 518-522, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-276769

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which primary care doctors assessed patients newly diagnosed with hypertension for the risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) during the patients' first clinic visit for hypertension. The study also aimed to examine the trend of assessment for CVD risk factors over a 15-year period.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This retrospective study was conducted between January and May 2012. Data was extracted from the paper-based medical records of patients with hypertension using a 1:4 systematic random sampling method. Data collected included CVD risk factors and a history of target organ damage (TOD), which were identified during the patient's first visit to the primary care doctor for hypertension, as well as the results of the physical examinations and investigations performed during the same visit.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 1,060 medical records were reviewed. We found that assessment of CVD risk factors during the first clinic visit for hypertension was poor (5.4%-40.8%). Assessments for a history of TOD were found in only 5.8%-11.8% of the records, and documented physical examinations and investigations for the assessment of TOD and secondary hypertension ranged from 0.1%-63.3%. Over time, there was a decreasing trend in the percentage of documented physical examinations performed, but an increasing trend in the percentage of investigations ordered.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There was poor assessment of the patients' CVD risk factors, secondary causes of hypertension and TOD at their first clinic visit for hypertension. The trends observed in the assessment suggest an over-reliance on investigations over clinical examinations.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diagnosis , Hypertension , Diagnosis , Physicians, Family , Primary Health Care , Methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
5.
Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine ; : 17-23, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-626694

ABSTRACT

The Aging Male Symptoms Scale (AMS) measures health-related quality of life in aging men. The objective of this paper is to describe the translation and validation of the AMS into Bahasa Melayu (BM). The original English version of the AMS was translated into BM by 2 translators to produce BM1 and BM2, and subsequently harmonized to produce BM3. Two other independent translators, blinded to the English version, back-translated BM3 to yield E2 and E3. All versions (BM1, BM2, BM3, E2, E3) were compared with the English version. The BM pre-final version was produced, and pre-tested in 8 participants. Proportion Agreement, Weighted Kappa, Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, and verbatim responses were used. The English and the BM versions showed excellent equivalence (weighted Kappa and Spearman Rank Coefficients, ranged from 0.72 to 1.00, and Proportion Agreement values ranged from 75.0% to 100%). In conclusion, the BM version of the AMS was successfully translated and adapted.

6.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 710-717, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-227275

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The proposed Men's Health Index (MHI) aims to provide a practical and systematic framework for comprehensively assessing and stratifying older men with the intention of optimising their health and functional status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed from 1980 to 2012. We specifically looked for instruments which: assess men's health, frailty and fitness; predict life expectancy, mortality and morbidities. The instruments were assessed by the researchers who then agreed on the tools to be included in the MHI. When there was disagreements, the researchers discussed and reached a consensus guided by the principle that the MHI could be used in the primary care setting targetting men aged 55-65 years. RESULTS: The instruments chosen include the Charlson's Combined Comorbidity-Age Index; the International Index of Erectile Function-5; the International Prostate Symptom Score; the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Male; the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Instrument; the Sitting-Rising Test; the Senior Fitness Test; the Fitness Assessment Score; and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. A pilot test on eight men was carried out and showed that the men's health index is viable. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of assessing, stratifying, and optimizing men's health should be incorporated into routine health care, and this can be implemented by using the MHI. This index is particularly useful to primary care physicians who are in a strategic position to engage men at the peri-retirement age in a conversation about their life goals based on their current and predicted health status.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aging/physiology , Health Status , Life Expectancy/trends , Men's Health/standards
7.
Asian Journal of Andrology ; (6): 99-104, 2004.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-300859

ABSTRACT

<p><b>AIM</b>To explore the barriers faced by general practitioners (GPs) in the management of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a qualitative analysis of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews involving 28 Malaysian GPs.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>GPs' perception of ED being not a serious condition was a major determinant of their prescribing practice. Doctor's age (younger), gender (female), short consultation time and lack of experience were cited as barriers. The GPs' prescribing habits were heavily influenced by the feedback from the first few patients under treatment, the uncertainty of etiology of ED without proper assessment and the profit margin with bulk purchase. Other barriers include Patients' coexisting medical conditions, older age, lower socio-economic status, unrealistic expectations and inappropriate use of the anti-impotence drugs. Cardiovascular side effects and cost were two most important drug barriers.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The factors influencing the management of ED among the general practitioners were multiple and complex. An adequate understanding of how these factors (doctors, patients and drugs) interact can assist in the formulation and implementation of strategies that encourage GPs to identify and manage ED patients.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Age Factors , Drug Costs , Drug Prescriptions , Erectile Dysfunction , Epidemiology , Psychology , Therapeutics , Focus Groups , Malaysia , Epidemiology , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors , Economics , Therapeutic Uses , Physicians, Family , Piperazines , Economics , Therapeutic Uses , Purines , Referral and Consultation , Sex Factors , Sildenafil Citrate , Socioeconomic Factors , Sulfones
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL